365bet官网阅览模仿题:Lighting Up The Lies

2017-05-29 10:38:00来历:网络

  新东方在线365bet官网网特为咱们预备了365bet官网阅览模仿题:Lighting Up The Lies。365bet官网模仿试题在365bet官网备考进程中所起的效果不行小觑,经过模仿练习题,咱们可以很直接地了解到自己的备考情况,然后可以更有针对性地进行之后的温习。期望以下内容可以对咱们的365bet官网备考有所协助!更多365bet官网报名官网的最新消息,最新、最专业的365bet官网备考材料,新东方在线365bet官网网将第一时刻为咱们发布。

  Lighting Up The Lies

  You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on Reading Passage below.

  Last year Sean A. Spence, a professor at the school of medicine at the University of Sheffield in England, performed brain scans that showed that a woman convicted of poisoning a child in her care appeared to be telling the truth when she denied committing the crime. This deception study, along with two others performed by the Sheffield group, was funded by Quickfire Media, a television production company working for the U.K.'s Channel 4, which broadcast videos of the researchers at work as part of a three-part series called "Lie Lab." The brain study of the woman later appeared in the journal European Psychiatry.

  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) purports to detect mendacity by seeing inside the brain instead of tracking peripheral measures of anxiety—such as changes in pulse, blood pressure or respiration —measured by a polygraph. Besides drawing hundreds of thousands of viewers, fMRI has pulled in entrepreneurs. Two companies—Cephos in Pepperell, Mass., and No Lie MRI in Tarzana, Calif.—claim to predict with 90 percent or greater certitude whether you are telling the truth. No Lie MRI, whose name evokes the casual familiarity of a walk-in dental clinic in a strip mall, suggests that the technique may even be used for “risk reduction in dating”.

  Many neuroscientists and legal scholars doubt such claims—and some even question whether brain scans for lie detection will ever be ready for anything but more research on the nature of deception and the brain. An fMRI machine tracks blood flow to activated brain areas. The assumption in lie detection is that the brain must exert extra effort when telling a lie and that the regions that do more work get more blood. Such areas light up in scans; during the lie studies, the illuminated regions are primarily involved in decision making.

  To assess how fMRI and other neuroscience findings affect the law, the Mac-Arthur Foundation put up $10 million last year to pilot for three years the Law and Neuroscience Project. Part of the funding will attempt to set criteria for accurate and reliable lie detection using fMRI and other brain-scanning technology. “I think it's not possible, given the current technology, to trust the results,” says Marcus Raichle, a neuroscientist at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis who heads the project's study group on lie detection. “But it’s not impossible to set up a research program to determine whether that’s possible.” A major review article last year in the American Journal of Law and Medicine by Henry T. Greely of Stanford University and Judy Illes, now at the University of British Columbia, explores the deficiencies of existing research and what may be needed to move the technology forward. The two scholars found that lie detection studies conducted so far (still less than 20 in all) failed to prove that fMRI is “effective as a lie detector in the real world at any accuracy level.”

  Most studies examined groups, not individuals. Subjects in these studies were healthy young adults—making it unclear how the results would apply to someone who takes a drug that affects blood pressure or has a blockage in an artery. And the two researchers questioned the specificity of the lit-up areas; they noted that the regions also correlate with a wide range of cognitive behaviors, including memory, self- monitoring and conscious self-awareness.

  The biggest challenge for which the Law and Neuroscience Project is already funding new research—is how to diminish the artificiality of the test protocol. Lying about whether a playing card is the seven of spades may not activate the same areas of the cortex as answering a question about whether you robbed the corner store. In fact, the most realistic studies to date may have come from the Lie Lab television programs. The two companies marketing the technology are not waiting for more data. Cephos is offering scans without charge to people who claim they were falsely accused if they meet certain criteria in an effort to get scans accepted by the courts. Allowing scans as legal evidence could open a potentially huge and lucrative market. “We may have to take many shots on goal before we actually see a courtroom.” says Cephos chief executive Steven Laken. He asserts that the technology has achieved 97 percent accuracy and that the more than 100 people scanned using the Cephos protocol have provided data that have resolved many of the issues that Greely and Illes cited.

  But until formal clinical trials prove that the machines meet safety and effectiveness criteria, Greely and Illes have called for a ban on non-research uses. Trials envisaged for regulatory approval hint at the technical challenges. Actors, professional poker players and sociopaths would be compared against average Joes. The devout would go in the scanner after nonbelievers. Testing would take into account social setting. White lies—“no, dinner really was fantastic”—would have to be compared against untruths about sexual peccadilloes to ensure that the brain reacts identically.

  There potential for abuse prompts caution. “The danger is that people’s lives can be changed in bad ways because of mistakes in the technology,” Greely says. “The danger for the science is that it gets a black eye because of this very high profile use of neuroimaging that goes wrong.” Considering the long and controversial history of the polygraph, gradualism may be the wisest course to follow for a new diagnostic that probes an essential quality governing social interaction.

  Question 1-7

  Use the information in the passage to match the people (listed A-D) with opinions or deeds below. Write the appropriate letters A-D in boxes 1-7 on your answer sheet.

  NB you may use any letter more than once

  A Henry T. Greely &Judy Illes

  B Steven Laken

  C Henry T. Greely

  D Marcus Raichle

  1 The possibility hidden in a mission impossible

  2 The uncertain effectiveness of functional magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lies

  3 The hazard lying behind the technology as a lie detector

  4 The limited fields for the use of lie detection technology

  5 Several successful cases of applying the results from the lie detection technology

  6 Cons of the current research related to lie-detector tests

  7 There should be some requested work to improve the techniques regarding lie detection

  Question 8-10

  Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?

  In boxes 8-10 on your answer sheet, write

  TRUE if the statement is true

  FALSE if the statement is false

  NOT GIVEN if the information is not given in the passage

  8 The lie detection for a convicted woman was first conducted by researchers in Europe.

  9 The legitimization of using scans in the court might mean a promising and profitable business.

  10 There is always something wrong with neuroimaging.

  Question 11-13


  Complete the following summary of the paragraphs of Reading Passage, using No More than Three words from the Reading Passage for each answer. Write your answers in boxes 11-13 on your answer sheet.

  It is claimed that functional magnetic resonance imaging can check lies by observing the internal part of the brain rather than following up 11 to evaluate the anxiety as 12 does. Audiences as well as 13 are fascinated by this amazing lie-detection technology.




  结构:A:Sean A. Spence关于毒死孩子的妇女的测谎实验



  D:为fMRI树立的研讨项目,Henry T. Greely 和Judy Illes不信任fMRI

  E:fMRI的研讨目标令Henry T. Greely 和Judy Illes提出质疑



  H:Henry T. Greely关于fMRI的正告及作者的主张


  Question 1-7

  标题类型:List of opinions and deeds


  上一年,英国谢菲尔德大学医学院教授Sean A. Spence 在对一位将自己照料的孩子毒死的妇女的大脑进行扫描时发现,这位被科罪的妇女在否定自己的犯罪事实时,看起来像是在说真话。这项关于诈骗的研讨,连同其它两个由谢菲尔德小组领导的研讨是由Quickfire Media赞助的,Quickfire Media是一家电视节目制造公司,播出频道为英国的第4频道,该频道播映这些研讨人员在作业时的视频,构成一个由三部分组成的系列节目的一部分,该系列叫做“谎话实验室”。对该妇女大脑的研讨之后出现在欧洲精神病学杂志上。

  功用磁共振成像仪(fMRI)宣称能经过看到大脑的内部来进行测谎,而不是经过追寻焦虑的外在体现:如经过测谎仪测出的脉息,血压或呼吸的改动,功用磁共振成像技能除了招引成百上千的观众外,还招引着企业家的目光。两家公司——马萨诸塞州Pepperell市的 Cephos 公司和加利福尼亚州Tarzana市的No Lie MRI 公司宣称对人们是否在说真话的猜测的准确率可以抵达90%乃至更高。No Lie MRI 这家公司的姓名自身就会让人想起一个了解的情形——就像走进一家坐落商业区的牙科诊所,标明该技能乃至或许被 用于“下降约会的风险。”


  为了评价功用磁共振成像仪和其他神经科学的发现怎么影响法令,麦克阿瑟基金上一年出资1,000万元来赞助一个将耗时三年的“法令和神经科学项目”。部分资金将会用来测验设置运用功用磁共振成像仪和其它脑部扫描技能来进行测谎的准确性和可靠性的规范。华盛顿大学圣路易斯医学院担任该项目测谎研讨小组的神经学家 Marcus Raichle 以为“在现有的技能前提下,很难彻底信任测谎的成果,可是树立一个项目以确认测谎成果的或许性这项提议是可行的。”斯坦福大学的 Henry T. Greely 和英国哥伦比亚大学的 Judy Illes 在上一年宣布在美国《法令与医学杂志》上的一篇谈论文章中探讨了现行研讨的不足之处以及为了推动技能进步或许需求改善之处。两位学者发现,迄今为止进行的测谎研讨(总数仍低于20)还不能证明磁共振成像仪作为测谎仪在实际国际中的任何的精度水平上都是有用的。


  最大的应战——一起也是“法令和神经枓学项目”为其赞助了新的研讨项目——是怎么削减测验协议的人为干涉程度。关于一张扑克牌是否是黑桃7的谎话或许无法激活与答复你是否掠夺了街角的一家商铺时的大脑皮质的同一区域。事实上,迄今为止最实际的研讨,有或许是来自“谎话实验室”这个电视节目。两家运营这样技能的公司不是再等候更多的数据。Cephos公司供应的免费的扫描是针对一些契合特定规范由法院答应的宣称自己是无罪的人。答应对大脑的扫描作为法令依据或许会翻开一个潜在的巨大和赢利丰盛的商场。Cephos公司的首席执行官Steven Laken说道“在上法庭之前,或许需求进行若干的测验”。他宣称该技能已抵达97%的准确率,而且有超越100个运用Cephos公司扫描的人现已经过取得数据处理了许多Greely and Illes提到过的问题。

  可是,Greely 和 Illes的呼吁在正式的临床实验证明该仪器可以满意安全性和有用性的规范前,该仪器不行用在非研讨范畴。要面临监管部门的同意的实验要面临技能上的应战。艺人,专业扑克玩家和反社会的人会和普通人进行比较。忠诚的人会跟在置疑论者的后边承受扫描。测验将需求考虑到社会环境。好心的谎话——“不,晚餐真是太棒了”——将会和有关性过错这样的谎话进行比对,以确保大脑对不同的谎话有相同的反响。

  人们要当心这项技能被乱用的风险。Greely 以为“风险在于人们的日子或许会由于技能中的过错往欠好的方向改动。科学的风险之处在于它有许多未知性,由于它很大程度上运用了过错的神经印象学。”鉴于绵长且有争议的测谎仪的前史,按部就班或许是最正确的挑选,来运用它作为一个新的确诊手法来检测社会管理的质量。

  • 新东方365bet官网7月公益课(第二期)



  • 365bet官网机经高频词汇套装



  • 【知己365bet官网】全科进步冲 7分班



  • 【知己365bet官网】旗舰VIP直达 6.5 分班



  • 365bet官网中心1200词背诵



  • 365bet官网阅览模仿题:Hormones in the Body

    新东方在线365bet官网网特为咱们预备了365bet官网阅览模仿题:Hormones in the Body。365bet官网模仿试题在365bet官网备考进程中所起的效果不行小觑,经过模仿练习题,咱们可以很直接地了解到自己的备考情况,然后可以更有针对性地进行之后的温习。期望以下内容可以对咱们的365bet官网备考有所协助!更多365bet官网报名官网的最新消息,最新、最专业的365bet官网备考材料,新东方在线365bet官网网将第一时刻为咱们发布。

    来历 : 网络 2017-05-28 10:42:00 关键字 : 365bet官网阅览 365bet官网模仿题

  • 365bet官网阅览模仿题:THE GAP of INGENUITY 2

    新东方在线365bet官网网特为咱们预备了365bet官网阅览模仿题:THE GAP of INGENUITY 2。365bet官网模仿试题在365bet官网备考进程中所起的效果不行小觑,经过模仿练习题,咱们可以很直接地了解到自己的备考情况,然后可以更有针对性地进行之后的温习。期望以下内容可以对咱们的365bet官网备考有所协助!更多365bet官网报名官网的最新消息,最新、最专业的365bet官网备考材料,新东方在线365bet官网网将第一时刻为咱们发布。

    来历 : 网络 2017-05-28 10:40:00 关键字 : 365bet官网阅览 365bet官网模仿题

  • 365bet官网阅览模仿题:New Ways of Teaching History

    新东方在线365bet官网网特为咱们预备了365bet官网阅览模仿题:New Ways of Teaching History。365bet官网模仿试题在365bet官网备考进程中所起的效果不行小觑,经过模仿练习题,咱们可以很直接地了解到自己的备考情况,然后可以更有针对性地进行之后的温习。期望以下内容可以对咱们的365bet官网备考有所协助!更多365bet官网报名官网的最新消息,最新、最专业的365bet官网备考材料,新东方在线365bet官网网将第一时刻为咱们发布。

    来历 : 网络 2017-05-29 10:37:00 关键字 : 365bet官网阅览 365bet官网模仿题

  • 365bet官网阅览模仿题:Compliance or Noncompliance for Children

    新东方在线365bet官网网特为咱们预备了365bet官网阅览模仿题:Compliance or Noncompliance for Children。365bet官网模仿试题在365bet官网备考进程中所起的效果不行小觑,经过模仿练习题,咱们可以很直接地了解到自己的备考情况,然后可以更有针对性地进行之后的温习。期望以下内容可以对咱们的365bet官网备考有所协助!更多365bet官网报名官网的最新消息,最新、最专业的365bet官网备考材料,新东方在线365bet官网网将第一时刻为咱们发布。

    来历 : 网络 2017-05-30 10:34:00 关键字 : 365bet官网阅览 365bet官网模仿题

  • 365bet官网阅览全真模仿题:美好的科学解说


    来历 : 网络 2017-05-30 10:30:00 关键字 : 365bet官网阅览 365bet官网模仿题